HANSESTRAFRECHT
Deserted pedestrian underpass at night in the cool light of the ceiling lamps.

Drugs

Drug possession in Germany: where personal use ends and trafficking begins

Author
Rechtsanwältin Virginia Elisabeth von Burgsdorff
Published
Last updated
Topics
Drugs
9 minute read
9 minute read

There is no statutory quantity at which possession automatically becomes trafficking (Handeltreiben). The Konsumcannabisgesetz does name limits in grammes, but they only say how much cannabis one may possess; they say nothing about the dividing line to trafficking. What decides the question is whether the narcotics were intended for your own consumption or were directed at turnover, meaning at passing them on in return for an advantage. The quantity found is only one indicator among several; packaging, precision scales, cash and the content of messages come on top of it. For the question of drug possession and punishment, a gramme more or less therefore matters less than what the investigation file shows about the purpose of the possession.

01

Two statutes, two separate sets of rules

Since the Konsumcannabisgesetz (the Cannabis Act, abbreviated KCanG), different rules apply to cannabis than to all other narcotics: cannabis follows the KCanG, everything else continues to follow the Betäubungsmittelgesetz (the Narcotics Act, abbreviated BtMG). Anyone who mixes the two arrives at wrong results, because the KCanG names express limits in grammes and the BtMG precisely does not.

Under § 29 Abs. 1 BtMG (Abs. is the German abbreviation for the subsection of a provision), anyone who deals with narcotics without authorisation is punished with imprisonment of up to five years or a fine. This covers, among other things, cultivation, production, trafficking, importation, exportation, supply and possession without the required permit. In particularly serious cases the penalty under § 29 Abs. 3 BtMG is imprisonment of not less than one year; there the statute names commercial conduct and endangering the health of several people as standard examples.

02

What the KCanG allows and where criminal liability begins

§ 2 Abs. 1 KCanG prohibits dealing with cannabis in principle. § 2 Abs. 3 KCanG takes individual cases out of that prohibition for adults, among them possession under § 3 KCanG and private cultivation for one's own use.

Under § 3 Abs. 1 KCanG, adults may possess up to 25 grammes of cannabis for their own consumption. For flowers, leaves close to the flowers and other plant material, the weight refers to the state after drying. At the residence or habitual abode, § 3 Abs. 2 KCanG allows up to 50 grammes and no more than three living cannabis plants.

Above these figures the statute draws a further distinction. Under § 36 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 KCanG it is a regulatory offence if someone possesses more than 25 and up to 30 grammes at a place that is not their residence or habitual abode, or more than 50 and up to 60 grammes in total. Only above that does criminal liability begin: § 34 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 KCanG covers the possession of more than 30 grammes away from the place of residence, of more than 60 grammes in total, and of more than three living plants. § 34 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 KCanG also makes it an offence to cultivate more than three plants at the same time or to cultivate at all other than for one's own consumption. The sentencing range of § 34 Abs. 1 KCanG is imprisonment of up to three years or a fine.

The zone between regulatory offence and criminal offence is often overlooked. It decides whether a regulatory fine procedure or a criminal investigation is running.

03

Where is the line to trafficking?

Trafficking requires an activity directed at turnover. The statute defines no quantity for it. In practice, the police and the public prosecution office infer the purpose from external circumstances: packaging in portions, sales notes, recurring incoming payments, chat histories. Weight plays a part too, but on its own it does not carry the assumption.

For you this has an uncomfortable consequence. The difference between possession and trafficking is often not decided by what was found, but by what accused people say about it in the first interview. Under § 136 Abs. 1 Satz 2 StPO (Satz means sentence, StPO is the Strafprozessordnung, the German Code of Criminal Procedure), you are free to comment on the accusation or to make no statement on the matter, and you may consult a defence lawyer at any time, including before the interview.

04

What does a nicht geringe Menge trigger?

The nicht geringe Menge, the quantity that is not a small one, is the point at which the sentencing range shifts markedly.

Under § 29a Abs. 1 BtMG, imprisonment of not less than one year is imposed on a person over 21 years of age who without authorisation supplies narcotics to a person under 18, administers them to that person or leaves them to that person for immediate consumption (number 1), or on anyone who without authorisation trafficks in narcotics in a quantity that is not a small one, produces or supplies them in such a quantity, or possesses them in such a quantity without having obtained them on the basis of a permit under § 3 Abs. 1 BtMG (number 2). The requirement in number 1 relating to the offender is not a side issue: someone who supplies the narcotics and is not older than 21 does not fall under that provision. In less serious cases the range under § 29a Abs. 2 BtMG is three months to five years. § 30 Abs. 1 BtMG provides for imprisonment of not less than two years, among other things for unauthorised importation in a quantity that is not a small one and for acting as a member of a gang; less serious cases carry three months to five years under § 30 Abs. 2 BtMG. Finally, § 30a Abs. 1 und 2 BtMG provides for imprisonment of not less than five years, for instance for gang trafficking in a quantity that is not a small one and for carrying a firearm; in less serious cases § 30a Abs. 3 BtMG provides for six months to ten years.

For cannabis, § 34 Abs. 3 Nr. 4 KCanG names the quantity that is not a small one as a standard example of a particularly serious case, with a range of three months to five years. § 34 Abs. 4 KCanG provides for imprisonment of not less than two years for more serious variants, and three months to five years in less serious cases.

What matters is what appears in none of these statutes: a figure. Neither the BtMG nor the KCanG lays down when a quantity is not a small one. The courts determine that on the basis of the quantity of active substance, and the values differ from substance to substance; for cannabis the question is still in motion under the KCanG. Tables with gramme figures found online therefore reproduce case law, not statutory text. Whether a quantity falls below the threshold can only be assessed once the active substance content has been examined.

05

Personal use: can the case end without charges being brought?

The statute provides two routes for this.

Under § 31a Abs. 1 BtMG, in the case of an offence under § 29 Abs. 1, 2 oder 4 BtMG the public prosecution office may refrain from prosecution if the guilt would be minor, there is no public interest in prosecution and only a small quantity for one's own consumption is involved. After charges have been brought, the court may discontinue the case on the same conditions with the consent of the public prosecution office and of the person charged, § 31a Abs. 2 BtMG.

In addition, under § 29 Abs. 5 BtMG the court may refrain from imposing a penalty where the offender cultivates, produces, imports, exports, transports through, acquires, otherwise obtains or possesses the narcotics solely for their own consumption in a small quantity.

Both are discretionary decisions. There is no entitlement to them, and nobody can tell you in advance how they will turn out.

06

Treatment instead of enforcement of the sentence

Anyone convicted of an offence committed on account of a narcotics dependency can obtain a deferral of the enforcement of the sentence under the conditions of § 35 Abs. 1 BtMG if they are in treatment or undertake to enter treatment. The statute names for this a custodial sentence of not more than two years; the deferral is limited to two years at most. Under § 36 Abs. 1 BtMG the time spent in the institution, once evidenced, is credited against the sentence until two thirds of the sentence have been served.

07

Assistance in solving offences under § 31 BtMG: what goes with it

§ 31 BtMG opens up a further route, and it comes with conditions that you should know before taking it.

The court may mitigate the sentence under § 49 Abs. 1 StGB (the Strafgesetzbuch, the German Criminal Code) if someone, by voluntarily disclosing their knowledge, has made a substantial contribution to the detection of an offence under §§ 29 bis 30a BtMG connected with their own offence (number 1), or if they disclose their knowledge to an official body in good enough time for such an offence, whose planning they know of, still to be prevented (number 2).

The court may refrain from imposing a penalty only on an additional condition: that the offender has not incurred a custodial sentence of more than three years. That limit appears in this form in the statute, and it applies only to refraining from a penalty, not to mitigation.

Two further points appear in the same provision. If the offender was involved in the offence, their contribution to solving it must extend beyond their own part in it; their own confession is not enough for this. And § 31 Satz 3 BtMG declares § 46b Abs. 2 und 3 StGB to apply accordingly. Subsection 3 of that provision excludes mitigation and refraining from a penalty where someone discloses their knowledge only after the opening of the main proceedings against them has been ordered.

Whether this route comes into consideration in an individual case depends on the state of the evidence and on personal risks. How a court will decide cannot be said in advance. It is a decision with far reaching consequences, and it should not be taken without access to the file and without advice.

08

Drugs at the wheel are a separate case

Something found in a car regularly brings a second set of proceedings with it, and a separate provision applies to cannabis in that context. Under § 24a Abs. 1a StVG (the Straßenverkehrsgesetz, the German Road Traffic Act), a person commits a regulatory offence who intentionally or negligently drives a motor vehicle on the road although they have 3.5 ng/ml or more of tetrahydrocannabinol in their blood serum. That value appears in this form in the statute. For other intoxicating substances, § 24a Abs. 2 StVG applies in conjunction with the annex to that provision; that annex does not list cannabis or tetrahydrocannabinol, but heroin, cocaine, amfetamine, the designer amfetamines named there and metamfetamine. Anyone who has also been drinking alcohol or sets off under its influence falls under § 24a Abs. 2a StVG. The regulatory fine can amount to up to 3,000 euros in the cases relevant here, subsections 1a and 2 sentence 1, and up to 5,000 euros in the cases of subsection 2a (§ 24a Abs. 3 StVG). If it is added that someone was unable to drive the vehicle safely as a result of intoxicating substances, § 316 StGB applies, with imprisonment of up to one year or a fine; negligent commission is covered as well.

Frequently asked questions

From what quantity onwards does possession count as trafficking?

The statute names no such quantity. Trafficking requires an activity directed at turnover. Quantity is one indication alongside packaging, records, cash and communication.

Only within narrow limits. § 3 KCanG allows adults up to 25 grammes for their own consumption and, at their residence or habitual abode, up to 50 grammes and no more than three living plants. Between 25 and 30 grammes away from the residence and habitual abode, and between 50 and 60 grammes in total, there is a regulatory offence under § 36 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 KCanG. Above that, criminal liability under § 34 Abs. 1 KCanG begins.

That appears in no statute. The courts determine the threshold according to the quantity of active substance, separately for each substance. For cannabis the question has not yet been finally settled under the KCanG. Do not rely on figures from forums.

No. Under § 136 Abs. 1 Satz 2 StPO you are free not to comment on the matter, and you may consult a defence lawyer beforehand. Statements about where the drugs came from frequently turn an allegation of possession into an allegation of trafficking.

This information is general in nature and does not replace advice on an individual case. It reflects the statutory texts as checked on 10 August 2026.

More on how we defend people accused in narcotics cases can be found on our page on drug offence law.

If you would like to discuss your case, you can reach the office by telephone or by email.

Contact
Provisions referred to

The provisions mentioned in this article, each with a link to the official German text.