
Collateral consequences
Conviction and waffenrechtliche Zuverlässigkeit: what happens to the permit
- Author
- Rechtsanwältin Virginia Elisabeth von Burgsdorff
- Published
- Last updated
- Topics
- Collateral consequences
- 10 minute read
- 10 minute read
The permit is decided on by the Waffenbehörde (the authority responsible for weapons permits), not by the criminal court. The criminal proceedings supply only the fact to which weapons law attaches: a conviction that has become final, and its level. Whether the waffenrechtliche Zuverlässigkeit (the reliability required under weapons law) is thereby lost is governed by § 5 WaffG, and that examination takes place in separate administrative proceedings by its own standards. How it turns out is something nobody can predict from the criminal law side.
What can be said from the criminal law side is something different and at least as important for those affected: which figures weapons law attaches to, and why the number of Tagessätze (daily units) in criminal proceedings therefore carries a significance that reaches beyond those proceedings.
Who decides what?
The criminal court decides on guilt and sentence. The Waffenbehörde decides on the permit. § 4 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 WaffG makes the permit dependent, among other things, on the applicant possessing the required reliability under § 5 WaffG and the personal suitability under § 6 WaffG. Where these requirements fall away later, § 45 WaffG applies.
A defence in criminal proceedings does not conduct proceedings under weapons law and cannot avert a revocation. It can, however, make visible which points are being settled in the criminal proceedings that will afterwards take effect under weapons law.
What the waffenrechtliche Zuverlässigkeit depends on
§ 5 WaffG distinguishes two tiers.
§ 5 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 WaffG names the cases in which the required reliability is absent: where there is a final conviction for a Verbrechen, the more serious of the two categories of criminal offence in German law, for other intentional criminal offences to a prison sentence of at least one year, or for the offences against the state individually listed there to a prison sentence or a fine of at least 90 Tagessätze, in each case where ten years have not yet passed since the last conviction became final.
§ 5 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WaffG names the cases in which reliability is as a rule absent. Covered are convictions for an intentional criminal offence, for a negligent criminal offence in connection with handling weapons, ammunition or explosive substances, for a negligent offence dangerous to the public, or for an offence under the Waffengesetz, the Gesetz über die Kontrolle von Kriegswaffen, the Sprengstoffgesetz or the Bundesjagdgesetz. The threshold: a prison sentence, a Jugendstrafe (the custodial sanction provided for young people), a fine of at least 60 Tagessätze or at least twice a lower fine; also covered are the cases in which the imposition of a Jugendstrafe has been suspended. The period: five years since the last conviction became final.
The wording "in der Regel" is not a side issue. By it the statute sets up a standard presumption and not something automatic without exception. Whether a set of facts departing from the standard case is present is examined by the Waffenbehörde, and in a dispute by the administrative courts. How that examination turns out is not something we predict here.
The practical point lies in § 40 StGB. Under its Absatz 1 a fine is imposed in Tagessätze (daily units), under Absatz 2 the amount of a Tagessatz is determined separately according to the personal and financial circumstances, and under Absatz 4 the number and the amount are stated in the decision. For § 5 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WaffG only the number matters. Two fines with an identical total amount can therefore have entirely different effects under weapons law.
What applies while proceedings are running
§ 5 Abs. 4 WaffG governs the intermediate state: where proceedings for offences within the meaning of Absatz 1 Nr. 1 or Absatz 2 Nr. 1 have not yet been concluded, the competent authority may suspend the decision on the application for a permit under weapons law until the proceedings have been concluded with final effect. Under § 5 Abs. 3 WaffG, the periods do not include the time during which the person concerned was kept in an institution by order of an authority or of a judge.
How does the authority learn of it?
Not by chance. Under § 4 Abs. 3 WaffG the competent authority has to re examine holders of permits under weapons law at regular intervals, but at least after three years have passed, as to their reliability and personal suitability. Under § 5 Abs. 5 Nr. 1 WaffG it obtains for that purpose the unrestricted information from the Bundeszentralregister. That it receives this information follows from § 41 Abs. 1 Nr. 9 BZRG, which expressly names the authorities responsible for permits under weapons law and for the issuing of hunting licences. Under § 41 Abs. 3 BZRG the information is provided only on an express request and only for the stated purpose.
§ 51 Abs. 1 BZRG draws a limit: where the entry has been deleted or is due to be deleted, the offence and the conviction may no longer be held against the person in legal dealings and may not be used to their disadvantage. Under § 51 Abs. 2 BZRG, however, statutory legal consequences of the offence or of the conviction, as well as decisions already given, remain unaffected by this.
Personal suitability is a second question
§ 6 Abs. 1 WaffG concerns not the conviction but the person. Under it, people do not possess the required personal suitability where facts justify the assumption that they lack legal capacity, that they are dependent on alcohol or other intoxicating substances or are mentally ill, or that because of circumstances relating to their person they cannot handle weapons or ammunition carefully or properly, or that there is a specific danger to others or to themselves. Where such concerns exist, the authority has under § 6 Abs. 2 WaffG to require the production of a certificate from a public health officer, a specialist doctor or a specialist psychologist, at the expense of the person concerned.
Facts that do not lead to a conviction under criminal law can therefore also acquire significance under weapons law.
What does a revocation set in motion?
§ 45 Abs. 1 WaffG orders withdrawal where it becomes known afterwards that the permit should have been refused. § 45 Abs. 2 Satz 1 WaffG orders revocation where facts arise afterwards that would have had to lead to refusal. Both are framed as decisions the authority has no discretion over.
§ 46 WaffG follows on from this. Under Absatz 1, all copies of the permit document are to be returned without undue delay. Under Absatz 2 Satz 1 the authority orders that the previous holder must, within a reasonable period, permanently render the weapons or ammunition unusable or hand them over to a person entitled to hold them, and provide proof of this; once the period has passed without result, the objects are taken into official custody. Absatz 4 permits immediate custody in the cases named there, and Absatz 7 permits confiscation and realisation or destruction on the conditions named there.
These orders are to be complied with. Anyone who keeps a weapon for which there is no longer a permit is moving within the criminal provisions of § 52 WaffG, which in Absatz 3 Nr. 2 provides for imprisonment of up to three years or a fine for acquiring, possessing or carrying a firearm without the required permit, and a distinctly higher range for the cases named in Absatz 1.
Why an objection does not stop the matter
Under § 80 Abs. 1 VwGO, an objection and an action for annulment as a rule have suspensive effect. Under § 80 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Nr. 3 VwGO that effect falls away in cases prescribed by federal statute. That is precisely what two provisions of the Waffengesetz order: § 45 Abs. 5 WaffG for withdrawal and revocation, where the permit is set aside because the requirements of § 4 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 WaffG are absent or have fallen away, and § 46 Abs. 6 WaffG for the measures under Absätze 1 bis 5.
Interim legal protection then runs through § 80 Abs. 5 VwGO, that is, through an application to the court dealing with the main matter. That is administrative court proceedings and not part of the criminal proceedings.
Knives, events, Ordnungswidrigkeiten
Not every allegation under weapons law concerns firearms. § 42a Abs. 1 WaffG prohibits carrying imitation weapons, certain cutting and thrusting weapons, and knives with a blade that can be locked open with one hand as well as fixed blade knives with a blade length of more than 12 cm. § 42a Abs. 2 WaffG excepts from this, among other things, transport in a closed container; for the objects under Absatz 1 Nr. 2 und 3 the prohibition moreover does not apply where there is a legitimate interest. A breach of § 42a Abs. 1 WaffG is an Ordnungswidrigkeit, a regulatory offence punishable by an administrative fine, under § 53 Abs. 1 Nr. 21b WaffG, which under § 53 Abs. 2 WaffG can be sanctioned with an administrative fine of up to ten thousand euros. Alongside this, § 42 Abs. 1 WaffG prohibits carrying weapons at public events; under § 42 Abs. 4a WaffG this applies accordingly to carrying knives, with the exceptions listed there.
The hunting licence depends on the same standards. Under § 17 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BJagdG it is to be refused to people in whose case facts justify the assumption that they lack the required reliability or physical suitability. Under § 17 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BJagdG the competent authority obtains information from the Waffenbehörde as to whether reliability and personal suitability within the meaning of §§ 5 und 6 WaffG are present.
Anyone who might be affected in their occupation or in their residence status must know this: that too is decided not by the criminal court but by the body competent in each case, in separate proceedings under its own provisions. A statement about how that body will decide does not belong in a guide of this kind.
Frequently asked questions
From how many Tagessätze onwards does it become critical under weapons law?
For the offences listed there, § 5 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WaffG names a prison sentence, a Jugendstrafe, a fine of at least 60 Tagessätze or at least twice a lower fine, in each case within five years since the last conviction became final. For the cases named there, § 5 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 WaffG contains stricter requirements and a period of ten years.
Does a conviction automatically mean losing the permit?
§ 5 Abs. 2 WaffG frames a standard presumption, recognisable from the words "in der Regel". Whether an exceptional case is present is examined by the Waffenbehörde in its own proceedings. A forecast about that is not possible from the criminal law side.
Can I keep my weapons until my objection has been decided?
In the cases of § 45 Abs. 5 WaffG and § 46 Abs. 6 WaffG, an objection and an action for annulment have no suspensive effect. Orders under § 46 WaffG are therefore to be complied with; interim legal protection runs through § 80 Abs. 5 VwGO.
Does a deleted conviction still count?
Under § 51 Abs. 1 BZRG, the offence and the conviction may no longer be held against the person and may not be used to their disadvantage once the entry has been deleted or is due to be deleted. Under § 51 Abs. 2 BZRG, statutory legal consequences and decisions already given remain unaffected by this.
This information is general in nature and does not replace advice on an individual case. It reflects the statutory texts as checked on 10 August 2026.
Which points are settled in criminal proceedings before a conviction is established, and how a defence works towards that, is described on our page on general criminal law.
If you would like to discuss your case, you can reach the office by telephone or by email.
ContactProvisions referred to
The provisions mentioned in this article, each with a link to the official German text.
- § 4 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 und Abs. 3 WaffG (Zuverlässigkeit und persönliche Eignung als Erlaubnisvoraussetzung; erneute Prüfung in regelmäßigen Abständen, mindestens nach drei Jahren)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 5 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1, Abs. 3, Abs. 4 und Abs. 5 Nr. 1 WaffG (absolute Unzuverlässigkeit und Zehnjahresfrist; Regelunzuverlässigkeit ab 60 Tagessätzen und Fünfjahresfrist; Aussetzung der Entscheidung bei laufendem Verfahren; unbeschränkte Auskunft aus dem Bundeszentralregister)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 6 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 WaffG (persönliche Eignung; amts- oder fachärztliches oder fachpsychologisches Zeugnis auf eigene Kosten)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 45 Abs. 1, Abs. 2 und Abs. 5 WaffG (Rücknahme und Widerruf; keine aufschiebende Wirkung von Widerspruch und Anfechtungsklage in den dort genannten Fällen)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 46 Abs. 1, Abs. 2, Abs. 4, Abs. 6 und Abs. 7 WaffG (Rückgabe der Erlaubnisurkunde; Anordnung zur Unbrauchbarmachung oder Überlassung an einen Berechtigten; Sicherstellung; keine aufschiebende Wirkung; Einziehung und Verwertung)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 42a Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 WaffG (Verbot des Führens von Anscheinswaffen, bestimmten Hieb- und Stoßwaffen sowie Einhandmessern und feststehenden Messern mit einer Klingenlänge über 12 cm; Ausnahmen)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 42 Abs. 1 und Abs. 4a WaffG (Verbot des Führens von Waffen und Messern bei öffentlichen Veranstaltungen; Ausnahmen)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 52 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3 Nr. 2 WaffG (Strafvorschriften; Erwerb, Besitz oder Führen einer Schusswaffe ohne die erforderliche Erlaubnis)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 53 Abs. 1 Nr. 21b und Abs. 2 WaffG (Bußgeldvorschrift bei Verstoß gegen § 42a Abs. 1 WaffG; Geldbuße bis zu zehntausend Euro)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 17 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 und Satz 2 BJagdG (Versagung des Jagdscheines; Auskunft der Waffenbehörde zu den §§ 5 und 6 WaffG)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 40 Abs. 1, Abs. 2 und Abs. 4 StGB (Geldstrafe in Tagessätzen; Zahl und Höhe werden getrennt bestimmt und in der Entscheidung angegeben)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 41 Abs. 1 Nr. 9 und Abs. 3 BZRG (Auskunft an die für waffenrechtliche Erlaubnisse und die Erteilung von Jagdscheinen zuständigen Behörden; Auskunft nur auf ausdrückliches Ersuchen und nur für den angegebenen Zweck)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 51 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 BZRG (Verwertungsverbot bei getilgter oder zu tilgender Eintragung; gesetzliche Rechtsfolgen bleiben unberührt)checked on 10 August 2026
- § 80 Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Satz 1 Nr. 3 und Abs. 5 VwGO (aufschiebende Wirkung als Grundsatz; Wegfall in bundesgesetzlich vorgeschriebenen Fällen; gerichtlicher Antrag)checked on 10 August 2026